The Sklar Brothers

this time for my blog im going to write about my choice in humor centered around the comedy central special on the sklar brothers. they immediately open their act with a joke on how they are doing an audition for the hbo young, jewish, identical twin comedian special. the reason this line is so funny is because they play on their identity as young, jewish, identical twins where they are entering into a ridiculous competition. also, this joke would not work to well if the audience lacked the visual cues and the ability to see the twins on stage.

the unique ability of this comic pair is that most comedians come on as solo acts. the sklar brothers are able to play multiple characters on stage, and they can tell their stories with greater clarity because it is easier to have a conversation with another character than as a solo artist. similar to abbott and costello, the sklar brothers tell great stories by playing two different characters and by speaking with strong intonations and inflections. their piece on the "girls gone wild" parody allows one of them to play the announcer of the commercial and the other brother to play the role of a girl gone wild. another example of the benefit of having two comedians is the piece where the brothers play the roles of a homeowner and a telemarketer.

not only do they play different characters, but they both can play the same character and complete each others' sentences - creating a fast-paced act. on their skit about a father scolding the two brothers, they both say phrases that their father use to tell them, where both of them act like the father. the combination of the two comedians rapidly yelling lines creates confusion and chaos, but also allows the audience to feel how the brothers felt and allows the audience to hear the many voices of the father.

lastly, their ability to complete each others' lines is unique to the paired acts where solo artists have much trouble doing so. the completing of lines creates unity between the two comedians, but also creates unity with the audience as well. the situation feels like a conversation between multiple friends, and that is what makes the audience more comfortable. not only do the sklar brothers complete each others' lines, they also say the same lines. the muttering of the same phrases places higher emphasis on those lines and also acts as an exclamation.

comic pairs are difficult to find because there has to be so much continuity and cooperation between the comedians. finding other people that share the same beliefs and humor is difficult enough, yet you also have to get along with them and not feel like throwing them out, at least that is what the inebriated anthropologist says.

The Call

"Let me tell you the story
'Bout the call that changed my destiny
Me and my boys went out
Just to end up in misery
Was about to go home when
There she was standing in-front of me
And said "Hi, I got a little place nearby
Wanna go?"

the backstreet boys may be straight-forward with their message of hooking-up with some sweet chic at a party, but i feel that its a bit too shallow for me. regardless, i chose the title because i wanted to write about the phone calls that i've been having with my friend, maiko. though our conversations do not resemble the one described by the backstreet boys, the song was the first thing i thought of when i thought about phone calls.


it was 3 am on a saturday morning and i called maiko, my friend, who i've been talking to almost every night for the past 2 months now. i'm tired, she's tired, but we usually end up talking late at night and for almost an hour every time too. each conversation usually consists of a discussion about what happened throughout the day and how we felt about it or any new news that we haven't conveyed yet. pretty regular...

hymes describes a speech event as having a sender, a receiver, a message form, a channel, a code, a topic, and a setting. i've already briefly outlined most of the speech event criteria described by hymes, i'll also add that most of the conversation is spoken in japanese where i speak with a japanese level equivalent to a college education, and she speaks japanese fluently. i'll do my best in japanese until my words fail me and i'll have to switch to english to clarify. she'll say some sentences in grammatically incorrect english, but i still understand the essential meaning.

as for functions, hymes lists 7 forms: expressive, directive, poetic, contact, metalinguistic, referential, and contextual. the conversations i have with maiko normally utilize all 7. we show different emotions through speech by use of intonation and exclamatory phrases. i ask her for advice about what i should do next, and she offers suggestions and sometimes directs me to do certain things. sometimes the phone signals become weak and i wonder if she is still on the other line so i have to ask her if she can hear me. often we switch languages between english and japanese and sometimes i correct her pronunciation or i ask her to how say certain phrases in japanese. as for our regular conversations, we talk about events during the day and sometimes we discuss certain speeches that we have read.

hymes' factors and functions present a classification and checklist for how to analyze speech acts. conversation can be analyzed in an almost infinite number of ways, and hymes notes this but presents a nice structure also.

the truth stinks

after reading austin's article on performative utterances, the one topic that still resonates within me was how the truth and trust is so essential in our lives. for instance with the phrase, "the cat is on the mat but i don't believe it is" may say something similar to, "i promise to be there but i have no intention of going." austin states that these utterances are "outrageous" to the extent where the phrases are insincere because one does not flat out say what they mean. there is a lot of hidden concepts within our culture where everybody must withhold certain impolite responses or statements that another person may take offense to. for instance if a friend invites me to their brother's funeral and i say that i promise to go or simply that i will go, then it is understood that i will more likely go than not. however in my mind, i may be thinking that i will definitely not go and that is in no sense false or strange because i have freedom of choice. but it is socially unacceptable to boldly state one's intention that may upset the listener, which is simply cruel.

however, it is not unusual to think these thoughts and say a seemingly contradictory phrase. it happens quite often to me where a friend says that they'll be at a meeting on time or at dinner on time, but end up arriving later. that is acceptable, but is it fair to assume that my friend had the intention of arriving late? no, certainly not since there are all sorts of events and situations that may tie us up and keep us from our promises. however, that does not prevent me from making a judgement on my friends character where even though i may forgive them for being tardy, i am allowed to hold this against them in the future where i may designate tasks or assign responsibilities to someone without a tainted record.

so often do we do this, we forgive but we never forget. we calculate and add up our number of good deeds and gifts to others, and we subtract points from our friends and acquaintances whenever they make mistakes. true friendship is when we are able to look past all these expenses and examine our relationships as a complete whole. it is not that i buy my friend drinks every saturday night and she treats me to brunch on sunday. true friendship is when you buy drinks every saturday night, forget that you bought her drinks and then want to treat her to brunch on sunday as well. it is important to remember that when we give, we must keep on giving and never hold past good deeds against them. my best friend dan and i take turns treating each other to meals, but that does not mean that neither i nor he wouldn't want to pay for every meal.

so, it is fine to think that friends arrive late to practice every session, but one shouldn't hold that against them in the future. we do not define enemies as people who take more than they give and friends as people who you have a +/- relationship of 0, but rather true friends are people who give and give and give and forget that they have given and give some more. at least that's what the inebriated anthropologist says.